First draft, 4 November 2026. Independent of Restore Britain and of the government. Add a publisher's imprint before you use these pages as campaign material.

Millions must go.

A five-minute reading of that sentence, with the public record underneath it.

1. This site is a first draft for millionsmustgo.co.uk. It is not the official site of Restore Britain, and it is not a government paper. The party's own site is restorebritain.org.uk. The sentence at the top is theirs. The documents linked from these pages are public.
2. In the party's objective "Reverse Mass Immigration", published on 13 February 2026, the sentence has a specific meaning. People in the country illegally are to be removed. A foreign national who is here legally is to be removed if they cannot speak English, live in social housing, claim benefits, refuse to work, fail to integrate, commit crime, or hate the country and wish it harm. The objective then says that if that means millions go, then millions go. Read that page before repeating the sentence. A slogan without that paragraph is how the argument gets bent, by supporters as well as opponents.
3. The same objective says the party's own research puts the number of people living in Britain illegally at up to two million. That is a party figure, not a Home Office census. Treat it as their claim. The counts this draft is willing to print as records are on the figures page, each with a source and a date.
4. One reason the party gives for reversal is public safety. The sharpest case in its own papers is group-based child sexual exploitation: the grooming gangs. Baroness Casey's national audit, local inquiries, and criminal convictions have established a pattern in the towns that were properly examined. Men acting together, disproportionately of Pakistani heritage where ethnicity was actually recorded, abused mostly white girls, many of them in care. Police and councils looked away. Fear of a racism allegation is named by those inquiries as one reason. That record has its own pages. It is not a pretext for harassing a neighbour. This site does not publish addresses, hotel lists, or the names of people a court has not convicted.
5. National ethnicity data still does not exist in a form Casey was willing to trust. About two-thirds of perpetrators had no ethnicity recorded. She wrote that questions about ethnicity had been dodged for years, and that flawed data had been used to dismiss the pattern. She also wrote that this failure does a disservice to victims and to law-abiding people in Asian communities. Both points stay on this site. A page that drops the second one is easier to attack, and it is less true.
6. The party's response, under the heading "Crush the Rape Gangs", is a national strategy drawn from its own Rape Gang Inquiry: deportation of foreign nationals convicted of these offences, loss of British citizenship for dual nationals on conviction, cameras in every taxi and private hire vehicle, and policing that does not drop a case to keep the peace with a community. Those are proposals. They are set out on the policy page, tied back to the party's text.
7. What you can do with this draft is read, check the sources, and write to your MP. Near you has a short letter and the parliamentary route to the right address. Joining the party, if that is what you want, happens on the party's own site. This draft does not take your name, your email address, or your money. A political site that collects those things becomes a list for someone else to steal.

Where to go next

• The public record of the grooming gangs, and what the inquiries actually said.
• The figures, including the gaps the state still has not filled.
• The policy, in the party's words, on immigration and on these crimes.
• The statutory inquiry, which holds its first national hearings in December 2026.